Conclusion

  • Levack WM, Meyer T, Negrini S, Malmivaara A. Cochrane Rehabilitation Methodology Committee: an international survey of priorities for future work. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Oct;53(5):814–7. Pubmed link - Full text link
  • Mayo NE, Kaur N, Barbic SP, Fiore J, Barclay R, Finch L, et al. How have research questions and methods used in clinical trials published in Clinical Rehabilitation changed over the last 30 years? Clin Rehabil. 2016 Sep;30(9):847–64. Pubmed link - Full text link
  • Versiani AHV, Martimbianco AC, Peccin MS. Mapping of the evidence from systematic reviews of the Cochrane Collaboration for decision-making within physiotherapy. Sao Paulo Med J. 2013;131(1):39–45. Pubmed link - Full text link
  • Johnston MV, Dijkers MP. Toward improved evidence standards and methods for rehabilitation: recommendations and challenges. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Aug;93(8 Suppl):S185-199. Pubmed link - Full text link
  • Johnston MV, Sherer M, Whyte J. Applying evidence standards to rehabilitation research. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Apr;85(4):292–309. Pubmed link
  • Fritz JM, Cleland J. Effectiveness versus efficacy: more than a debate over language. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003 Apr;33(4):163–5. Pubmed link - Full text link
  • Miller PA, McKibbon KA, Haynes RB. A quantitative analysis of research publications in physical therapy journals. Phys Ther. 2003 Feb;83(2):123–31. Pubmed link
  • Schwartz SJ, Sturr M, Goldberg G. Statistical methods in rehabilitation literature: a survey of recent publications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 May;77(5):497–500. Pubmed link - Full text link
  • Katz RT, Campagnolo DI, Goldberg G, Parker JC, Pine ZM, Whyte J. Critical evaluation of clinical research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Jan;76(1):82–93. Pubmed link - Full text link
  • Ottenbacher KJ. Why rehabilitation research does not work (as well as we think it should). Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Feb;76(2):123–9. Pubmed link - Full text link