• Levack WM, Meyer T, Negrini S, Malmivaara A. Cochrane Rehabilitation Methodology Committee: an international survey of priorities for future work. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Oct;53(5):814–7. Pubmed link - Full text link
• Armijo-Olivo S, da Costa BR, Cummings GG, Ha C, Fuentes J, Saltaji H, et al. PEDro or Cochrane to Assess the Quality of Clinical Trials? A Meta-Epidemiological Study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0132634. Pubmed link - Full text link
• Armijo-Olivo S, Cummings GG, Fuentes J, Saltaji H, Ha C, Chisholm A, et al. Identifying items to assess methodological quality in physical therapy trials: a factor analysis. Phys Ther. 2014 Sep;94(9):1272–84. Pubmed link - Full text link
• Armijo-Olivo S, Ospina M, da Costa BR, Egger M, Saltaji H, Fuentes J, et al. Poor reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool in physical therapy trials. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(5):e96920. Pubmed link - Full text link
• Chan L, Heinemann AW, Roberts J. Elevating the quality of disability and rehabilitation research: mandatory use of the reporting guidelines. Int J Rehabil Res. 2014 Jun;37(2):103–4. Pubmed link - Full text link
• Armijo-Olivo S, Fuentes J, Ospina M, Saltaji H, Hartling L. Inconsistency in the items included in tools used in general health research and physical therapy to evaluate the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials: a descriptive analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 17;13:116. Pubmed link - Full text link
• da Costa BR, Hilfiker R, Egger M. PEDro’s bias: summary quality scores should not be used in meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jan;66(1):75–7. Pubmed link - Full text link
• Versiani AHV, Martimbianco AC, Peccin MS. Mapping of the evidence from systematic reviews of the Cochrane Collaboration for decision-making within physiotherapy. Sao Paulo Med J. 2013;131(1):39–45. Pubmed link - Full text link
• Farmer SE, Wood D, Swain ID, Pandyan AD. Assessment of the risk of bias in rehabilitation reviews. Int J Rehabil Res. 2012 Dec;35(4):317–22. Pubmed link
• Abdul Latif L, Daud Amadera JE, Pimentel D, Pimentel T, Fregni F. Sample size calculation in physical medicine and rehabilitation: a systematic review of reporting, characteristics, and results in randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Feb;92(2):306–15. Pubmed link - Full text link
• Rushton A, Calvert M, Wright C, Freemantle N. Physiotherapy trials for the 21st century: time to raise the bar? J R Soc Med. 2011 Nov;104(11):437–41. Pubmed link - Full text link
• Dijkers MP. Ensuring inclusion of research reports in systematic reviews. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Nov;90(11 Suppl):S60-69. Pubmed link - Full text link
• Armijo-Olivo S, Macedo LG, Gadotti IC, Fuentes J, Stanton T, Magee DJ. Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2008 Feb;88(2):156–75. Pubmed link - Full text link
• Foley NC, Bhogal SK, Teasell RW, Bureau Y, Speechley MR. Estimates of quality and reliability with the physiotherapy evidence-based database scale to assess the methodology of randomized controlled trials of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. Phys Ther. 2006 Jun;86(6):817–24. Pubmed link
• Siemonsma PC, Walker MF. Practical guidelines for independent assessment in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 1997 Nov;11(4):273–9. Pubmed link